Food Safety Magazine

FSM: eDigest | January 15, 2013

Allergen Disclaimers Should Be True Warnings

By George Pontiakos

Allergen Disclaimers Should Be True Warnings

The purpose of allergen disclaimers is for the benefit and protection of consumers. Unfortunately, some manufacturers and suppliers have gone beyond the intent and morphed it into a tool for their own cost-reduction benefits. We have run across some suppliers that are using the label, “food manufactured on equipment that also manufactures foods that contain [allergen,]” when they are not running any allergen-identified production. In other words, by using this warning label on a product that does not contain allergens, manufacturers can limit accountability and provide cover for inadequate cleaning and/or poorly followed cross-contamination prevention programs. Sanitizing procedures that are acceptable for hygiene purposes may not be sufficient to remove all allergens, and additional steps are necessary. These necessary steps sometimes include rigorous cleaning practices that can go as far as the dismantling of equipment, analytical testing to verify that cleaning practices were effective or separate equipment for allergen and non-allergen product lines—all costly steps that could be dodged by a simple allergen disclaimer. Another thing to keep in mind is this type of statement is voluntary, not required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Until FDA sets clear standards, one of the only ways to avoid manufacturers or suppliers who utilize disclaimers for their own advantageous reasons is to look for those with legitimate certifications. For instance, a NSF Gluten-Free-certified company must undergo a scrupulous certification process that includes science-based annual inspections, ingredient verification, random product testing and announced audits. Companies with such certifications invest both the time and money to ensure their clients their intentions are correct. They take the extra step, not the easy one.

Although most companies do have genuine motivations for placing allergen disclaimers on their products, the few instill doubt especially in consumers. As they become more aware of their health and the foods that contribute to it, the more they are taking notice of labels. Consumers are already questioning the meaning of allergen disclaimers and which foods they are actually able to consume. If allergen disclaimer use continues on this path, consumers will no longer benefit from them. Some go as far as saying individuals with food allergies will eventually have difficulty finding foods they can consume.

George Pontiakos is president and CEO of BI Nutraceuticals. He oversees all aspects of operations for BI Nutraceuticals and the Zuellig Group Nutrition and Ingredients based in China. He holds a bachelor’s degree in business management from Farleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey.

 

Comments

Glenda Mahin

George..

Thank you for confirming my suspicions about the increasing use of "allergen disclaimers".

Glenda

January 15, 2013, 9:33 AM
Reply
Craig

If there were ever an article that needed a counter point, this one would be it.

January 17, 2013, 10:47 AM
Reply
Kristine

I have noticed recently the plethora of allergen disclaimers published on all kinds of food items. It seems that there has been an increase in such disclaimers; snack foods I have bought for years to no detriment to my daughter (tree nuts allergy) are now posting these "warning labels". Most of these items I now put back on the grocery store shelf because my daughter refuses to touch anything that has such disclaimer. I thought the sudden increase in such disclaimers was to reduce liability for the producers. I will be interested to see if more parents with children who have allergies will refuse to buy these items, and what kind of backlash (if any) this will have on the food producers.

February 25, 2013, 3:10 PM
Reply
Post a Comment
  1. Leave this field empty

Required Field